Skip to content
realMudda
Sign in

Where did the Indo-Aryan languages come from?

AI-drafted · awaiting admin review

Did the speakers of early Sanskrit come into India from Central Asia, or did the Indo-European languages spread out of India? New ancient-DNA studies have changed this old debate.

Disputed: evidence incompleteCulture, games, language & ideas

Indian claim

The 'Indigenous Aryans' or 'Out of India' view: Vedic culture grew in India itself, possibly from the Harappan civilisation, and there was no Aryan invasion or migration.

Evidence for the Indian claim

  • The old 'Aryan invasion' story, of conquerors who destroyed Harappan cities, has been abandoned by archaeologists; there is no evidence of such a conquest.
  • The Rakhigarhi study (Shinde et al., Cell, 2019) found that the Harappan individual had no detectable steppe ancestry, and that the Harappan-related population is the largest source of ancestry for people in South Asia today.
  • There is strong cultural continuity from Harappan times into later India in crafts, farming and settlement, as supporters of the indigenous view stress.

Commonly credited to

The migration view: people with ancestry from the Central Asian steppe moved into South Asia in the second millennium BCE and brought early Indo-Aryan speech, which mixed with the existing population.

Evidence for the other claim

  • Narasimhan et al. (Science, 2019), with 523 ancient genomes, found that steppe ancestry entered South Asia in the first half of the second millennium BCE, and today makes up a part (up to about 30%) of the ancestry of some groups.
  • The same Rakhigarhi finding (no steppe ancestry in the Harappan) fits the view that steppe ancestry arrived after the Harappan period.
  • Linguists note that Indo-Aryan is closest to Iranian languages, and that Indo-Aryan names of gods appear in a treaty of the Mitanni kingdom in Syria (about 1380 BCE), outside India.

What historians and scientists say

Most geneticists and linguists today accept a gradual migration and mixing in the second millennium BCE, not a violent invasion. People in India descend mainly from Harappan-related and older South Asian populations, with a smaller steppe-related share. Supporters of the indigenous view continue to contest how much this tells us about language and culture.

Sign in to share or suggest corrections. Or send it without signing in as a suggestion