Skip to content
India in Nutshell
Sign in
IssueStarter topicCG (IN): India (Country) › Chhattisgarh (State)Department: Environment and Forests Department / State Pollution Control Board · CG govt

Who is accountable

From the officers who run it up to the minister and the head of government. Names from the Government's official lists.

  1. Environment and Forests Department / State Pollution Control Board
  2. Head of the department: its Principal Secretary or Secretary in Chhattisgarh (titles differ by State).
  3. Chief Secretary, ChhattisgarhShri Vikas Sheelcsoffice.cg@gov.in
  4. Minister: the Chhattisgarh minister who holds this department.
  5. Chief Minister, ChhattisgarhShri Vishnu Deo Sai

File a grievance on CPGRAMS (Government of India)

As on: Chief Secretaries as on 1 Oct 2026; Chief Ministers as on 15 Oct 2026DoPT — Chief Secretaries / Advisors to the Administrators of States and UTs (as on 01.10.2026)Wikipedia — List of current Indian chief ministers (checked 15 Oct 2026)

Environment & pollutionInitiated by: Portal

Chhattisgarh: Coal mining in the Hasdeo Arand forests

India in Nutshell (starter topic)· 6 hours ago

Listed for:Chhattisgarh Assembly election 2028Chhattisgarh Assembly election 2033

Status:Open: No action reported yet.

No action reported yet.

Progress so far (0)

No progress reported yet.

Mining in the dense Hasdeo forests has been opposed by local tribal communities worried about their land, forests and water.

Questions to discuss

  • What should the State government and local bodies do first?
  • What can citizens do, and how do we hold the responsible department to account?

Sources

Results

no votes

No votes yet. Be the first.

Participants are self-selected; this is not a survey of all Indians.

Sign in to react
WhatsAppX

Raise it officially

This platform does not file complaints for you. You can also file on the government's official grievance portal:

CPGRAMS: Centralised Public Grievance Redress (pgportal.gov.in)

For · Needs fixing

No arguments on this side yet.

Against · Not a priority

No arguments on this side yet.

Comments